This post or chapter is incomplete and its contents will need further attention. Dessler 1999 looks at Katzenstein 1996 (cited under Identity ) from a positivist perspective and discusses constructivism and positivism in a clear and understandable way. In that series Kubálková 1998 supplies a common overview of constructivist theory. The Guarantee of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (1998): 171-200.
The Agent-Structure Challenge in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (1987): 335-370. To a specific extent, Laffey and Weldes 1997 agrees with Williams and Desch and claims that ideas are objectified and then fitted into the dominant rationalist discourse, and therefore a new constructivist method is necessary. Hopf 1998 offers a clear example of the differences between traditional and crucial constructivism.
Checkel 1998 reviews some significant books from this period and delivers a clear and readable, if not easy, overview of traditional constructivism. Guzzini and Leander 2006 presents a dialogue between Wendt and his (typically constructivist) critics. Standard constructivism differs from vital constructivism in two major respects: (1) it is a systemic nonnormative theory and (two) the theory shares realism’s issues with material elements of power.
Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Energy Politics.” International Organization 46 (1992): 391-425. It differs from realism in that constructivism points out the meanings that underlie the material aspects of energy. Williams 2004 links constructivism to classical realism by way of the function of Hans J. Morgenthau. Perhaps his most critical function, Wendt 1999 , is the initial big try to mount a cohesive social theory of international politics. Globe of Our Creating: Guidelines and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations.
He is credited with bringing constructivism to the forefront of international relations, but other critical constructivist theorists think about Wendt to be as well concerned with states and with the material aspects of energy and of the international method to genuinely be a constructivist theorist. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Investigation Plan in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Evaluation of Political Science four (2001): 391-416. Along with Wendt 1999 (cited under Alexander Wendt ), 1 of the two most widely study and most crucial constructivist operates.